Odbierze AURA — ten sam asystent, z którym rozmawiasz na czacie. Opowiedz o firmie własnymi słowami.
Zadzwoń terazPołączenie płatne wg cennika Twojego operatora. Rozmowę prowadzi asystent AI.
AURA może działać przez własny interfejs, aplikację oraz kanały, z których zespół korzysta już dziś. Każdy człowiek i każde narzędzie pracują na tym samym stanie biznesu.
Siedem kroków, które AURA wykonuje bez przerwy — od pojedynczego zdarzenia do wniosku, który zmienia następną decyzję.
…i z powrotem do Observe — cykl nie ma końca.
Działanie bez śladu w danych jest dla nas niedokończone. Ślad ma zawsze te same cztery ogniwa:
Poniższe liczby są ilustracją samego mechanizmu, a nie rezultatem, który osiągnęliśmy u klienta. Pokazują, jak wyglądałby ślad w danych, gdyby taka sytuacja wydarzyła się w Waszym lokalu.
AURA nie przypisuje sobie wyniku bez śladu w danych.
We connect what you already use: POS, calendar, spreadsheet, warehouse, booking system. Instead of replacing with new.
Companies with multiple systems and manual data transfers.
Each system works fine on its own, but they don't communicate. Someone re-enters orders from one panel to another once a day, someone else exports a spreadsheet and emails it. Copy-paste work is invisible in costs because no one invoices it, but it eats hours and generates errors that only surface with the client.
We connect the systems you already use and make sure the connection doesn't quietly break.
From simple data transfer to building a tool that doesn't exist yet.
We calculate timelines individually and give you a quote before we start. It depends on the same factors as price: number of systems being connected, what they expose, and documentation quality on the other end — which we can't control. Simple integration of two systems is shortest, connecting CRM with website, telephony and ads takes longer, and custom tool development is planned in stages. The order is fixed though: check what the other side exposes, define the source of truth, deploy, handle errors and logs.
The cost comes out of what the other side actually exposes — which is why we name a figure after the check, not before it. Passing data between two systems, wiring the CRM to the site and the phone, working on somebody else's API and building a tool that does not exist yet are four different levels of complexity, not four items in a basket. If an integration requires a paid account on the provider's side, we say so before the start — that is their bill, not ours.
The work nobody wanted to do disappears, along with the errors it caused. Data is in one place so reports don't require assembling three files. And you don't have to replace a proven system just because the new one has a prettier panel.
Before asking for an integration quote, calculate what its absence already costs. Formula: monthly_cost = manual_operations × time_per_operation × hourly_rate + cost_of_copy_errors.
At 40 operations a month of 10 minutes each, counting nothing but your team's hourly rate, you get a concrete sum of manual work — before a single error is added to it. That number is worth having at hand before the question of whether connecting systems pays off comes up — because this, and not nothing, is what the cost of a one-off job is compared against.
Each path has a different cost in time and a different durability.
A ready-made connector wins for simple, standard pairings. Where the business logic is non-standard or a system has no off-the-shelf support, a custom integration remains the option.
Four situations where it is better not to build one — at least not yet:
In each of these cases the honest answer is: not now, or not at all — not: let's build it and see.
An integration is only as good as the access and documentation we are given.
Missing documentation does not stop the work — it stretches it out, because part of the time goes into checking what the system vendor should have documented in the first place.
Four things are visible directly in both systems, without asking us anything.
A growing error log that nobody reads is a sign that the integration works technically, but nobody is managing it.
An integration moves data between systems — it does not improve the quality of data that is already wrong at the source, and it does not fix a system that is broken on its own.
We also cannot guarantee the system on the other side will work the same way a year from now — that depends on its vendor, not on us. And we do not build a new system to replace the one you already use — we connect what is there instead of swapping it out.
Missing error handling. An integration works perfectly in tests, because tests always send correct data — production sooner or later sends something nobody planned for: an empty email address, a duplicate order, a request limit that gets exceeded.
Without logs and an error alert, an integration like this goes quiet without anyone noticing. Data stops syncing, and the first person to spot it is a customer who paid for a product that does not exist in the other system. That is why error handling and logs are part of the integration scope, not an add-on for extra pay.
The accounts in the systems we connect, and the data flowing through them, are yours the whole time — we get access for the integration, not ownership of anything.
This limitation applies to any integration with someone else's system, not just our work — the more systems in the chain, the more places something can change without warning.
If your problem sounds different, neighbouring areas of the same system stand right next to it — AURA connects them to each other rather than selling them separately:
Tell us how this process looks at your company today: how many enquiries come in, who answers them and where they get lost. We will tell you what can be taken off a person, what is not worth touching, and how this area fits into the rest of the system.
Talk to Aura →Next step
We do not take everyone: first we look at your processes, sales and current systems and tell you honestly whether it makes sense for us to come in. A few questions, about five minutes.
Take the assessment →